Friday, November 10, 2017

Sometimes, Garth Turner is very right

Love him or hate him, Garth Turner does make some very good points in this blog post about where we are with the Toronto and Vancouver real estate markets.  
http://www.greaterfool.ca/2017/11/08/too-late-4/  @GarthTurner 

Imagine your disappointment at finally being able to buy a second investment property for your ageing Self, to come to town to your medical appointments or use in town when you’re going to go to the theatre only to have the government tell you that you have to pay a vacancy tax on the unit.

I agree with Garth Turner's  perspective in this article, that it is indeed punitive to punish people for investing in a secondary unit. We also added [ONTARIO] strict landlord tenant increase restrictions.

The government has not kept pace with providing for seniors in their elder years and have laid waste many pensions,raided by corporations for their cash values or diverted saving to pay creditors, so there is a great need for individuals to plan and save for their future retirement where the current government wants to look after everything for us. Sometimes, Garth Turner is very right.
People who bought personal-use properties, paid market value, shoveled out closing costs and foot ongoing property tax and financing charges are now looking at a staggering tax just for staying there less than 50% of the time. The tax also casts them as social pariah when, in fact, it’s the opposite. A guy living part-time in his Yaletown condo is shelling out the same money for occasional use of city services as the family of four living one floor below who suck up much more. He pays 100% of the tax and yet draws 50% less.  http://www.greaterfool.ca/2017/11/08/too-late-4/

In two circumstances, this article does not go far enough first to discuss the mortgage interest rate differential that will eliminate many buyers from the marketplace by having to qualify at a POSTED rate of 5.5% while actually getting a rate of three or 3.5 on the mortgage over 25 years.

The second issue is the lack of tax revenues for the Ontario government and especially the City of Toronto Municipal government for the land transfer tax that is charged to secondary buyers. If they are not buying a property, the city is not making the taxes and indeed the market is  down over 25% in activity versus last year. This will be reflected in the property tax revenues that the city has available to pay for services that it provides to it's residents next year. We have yet to hear how much the shortfall in revenues is from the actual forecast maybe,  Sue Ann Levy  can shed some better light  @sueannelevy 

What do you think?

Are you making a move this year? 





1 comment:

  1. Garth Turner and Sue Ann Levy are both right in the fact the additional rent controls have a detrimental impact on investors and government revenues. There's also a domino impact on the psyche of buyers, sellers, tenants and landlords. Too much artificial controls by government plague Free Markets. Many investors and I are seeking other options to create and earn higher yields such as Florida and Georgia where the Free Market is still not subject to rent controls.

    ReplyDelete