Showing posts with label Condo Expert David Pylyp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Condo Expert David Pylyp. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2020

2020 - Grab Some time together

Grab some time with me!



Let's Go for Coffee

Get acquainted

Tell me a story

Tell me your goals and dreams

Tell me your financial problems

Can be a Horton's or Starbucks

You pick...

Tell me what you need

#Toronto #west #realtor
David Pylyp
647 218 2414

Sales Representative
ASA Accredited Senior Agent
RE/MAX realty specialists inc., Brokerage

Friday, February 12, 2016

Multiple Offers by Brian Madigan

Counting the Offers and Advising the Bidders 

The Toronto resale housing market is relatively “hot”. There is a shortage of supply, and quite a few “buyers” for every property.

Offer Day

From the perspective of the Listing Agent, this can present quite a challenge on “Offer Day”.

Frequently, the property will be listed on MLS, the property will be available for showings for several days to permit an opportunity for everyone who has a genuine interest in the property to see it.

The “Offer Date” will be published as well as the time. For example: “offers will be gratefully accepted at 8:00 on Tuesday”.

Legal Notification Requirement

There is an obligation imposed upon Listing Agents in such circumstances to disclose:

1)    The number of Offers,

2)    But, not any of the terms.

This notification is to be provided to everyone who is making an Offer, essentially, that means the Buyer himself. In the case of those Buyers who are represented, then that notification would go directly to their agents.

This is the provision in the Code of Ethics:

Competing offers

26. (1) If a brokerage that has a seller as a client receives a competing written offer, the brokerage shall disclose the number of competing written offers to every person who is making one of the competing offers, but shall not disclose the substance of the competing offers.

(2) Subsection (1) applies, with necessary modifications, to a brokerage that has a seller as a customer, if the brokerage and the seller have an agreement that provides for the brokerage to receive written offers to buy.

The Dilemma

On Tuesday, everyone who has an Offer should know the number. That’s easy when all three Buyers surface by 10:00 am on Tuesday.

However, this is Toronto and the market is very “busy”. Unless the property is an “overpriced dump”, there should be several Offers. But, how many, and when did they come in?

Easily, there could be twenty Offers. When Offer #20 comes in, you can say “you’re one of twenty”. The next step is to contact the other 19. You will also appreciate that occurred with each Offer, other than the first. That’s a lot of phone calls! And, all within a three hour stretch!

Now, it would be easy enough if all the calls were spread out evenly throughout the day. They are not, they all surface within the last three hours.

One other issue is the fact that the Listing Agent cannot refer or make reference to an Offer unless it is actually “received”. That means, the Buyer’s agent has indicated that they have a signed offer in their possession for presentation.

All of this indicates that there are going to be a lot of last minute phone calls.

Delegation to a Receptionist or Assistant

If the Listing Agent has an Assistant, delegating the task of updating the numbers should immediately be assigned to them. The problem is that Buyers’ agents will call the Brokerage, speak to anyone on reception, the Assistant, and/or the Listing Agent. All of these calls will take place within the last couple of hours. So, who is going to make all those outbound calls?

Receptionist

It could be somewhat risky to use the receptionist at a busy brokerage. The larger brokerages will have several people answering the phones, but rarely will they be in a position to place the outbound calls. It could be hectic if several agents have Offer Presentations at the same time, or even on the same day.

The Count

Keeping track of the accurate count among three people, the Listing Agent, the Assistant and the Receptionist is going to be difficult at best.

As the count increase, some will withdraw. There’s method to their madness, they don’t want to unnecessarily bid up the price, because they believe that they may be competitive for the next house.

Advice to all Buyers

Make sure that you inform all of the potential Buyers what method you are going to use to keep them advised of the count. If you don’t, this is a great way to face a disciplinary proceeding and be hit with a $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 fine.

Personal Phone Calls

If the numbers are low enough, this would be the “gold standard”. Everyone gets a personal phone call advising them of the count, directly from the Listing Agent.

Mass Emails by Blind Copy

This works and is manageable for groups of 10 to 15. Each time there is an Additional Buyer, an email goes out to the group advising of the new number. Larger brokerages will often employ this method.

Website Notification

This method of notification can work when things get fast and furious. You would record the count on a webpage for all to see. From the Buyers’ agents’ perspective, it is simple and straightforward. All they have to do is “refresh the page” from their mobile phones. If they were to call the Listing agent, that agent could be tied up with 19 other people, so the call’s going to voice mail.

The Listing Agent can manage this by going into the backend of the website on their mobile device, or alternatively, if they have an Assistant, have that person update the website on a computer.

Dates and times of entry and notification are there for all to see. No one can complain about preferences being given to others.

What to Say

On the webpage, which could be a blog on your own site, or a dedicated page, or even a page on a website dedicated to this particular listing, you should include the following:

123 Main Street- Offers 8:00 pm Tuesday, xx February 201x.

Number of Offers Received

Count
1
2
3
4        Offer, Listing Brokerage, no collateral agreement
5
6
7
8        Offer, Listing Agent, Co-op % reduced by 0.5%
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Numbers 10 and 14 have withdrawn

Current Number: 18

Presentation Format

Using this type of presentation format will ensure that there is no confusion about the numbers and that if one person withdraws, then that is noted. Also, it avoids duplicates, since every “received” Offer is assigned its own number.

Many complaints are associated with the number count and particularly the running tally, when someone withdraws.

You will also notice that there are two Offers which possibly have the “inside track”. One Offer is another agent at the Listing Brokerage. This information needs to be communicated in writing. A phone call won’t do. So, here it is.

The second Offer in contention is from the Listing Agent and there is a one-half percent advantage. This collateral agreement needs to be disclosed including particulars of the extent of the reduction.

Offers “Received”

An Offer is received if its existence is communicated in writing to the Listing Agent by:

1)    Personal delivery
2)    fax,
3)    email, or
4)    text.

As a Listing Agent you may rely upon the underlying truth of the communication. But, that communication has to be in writing. Verbal statements are insufficient.

The communication may be as short as “I have an Offer for you” by TEXT, if you understood from whom it was sent and to which property it applied etc. The Buyer’s representative could also refer to having an 801 Form completed. It could be sent and that also would be sufficient. Even a short text to the effect that there was an 801 signed would work.

Remember, that the key aspect to the Offer being received is:

1)    the Offer exists, and
2)    the Listing Agent has written notice of the Offer’s existence.

Registered Offers

This is, of course, quite different from “registration” of an Offer. In that case, a phone call or other verbal assurance could be made and arrangements made for presentation. This “registered” arrangement takes place without a real Offer having been signed. The Buyer’s representative proposes to have it signed later in the day but wishes to be advised, so that they will be in the loop.

It is not proper to include this Offer in the count until it goes from being “registered” to being “received”.

If you run into problems here, don’t hesitate to retain a Barrister, Solicitor or secure the advice from a lawyer on this point.

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Pets in your Condo - What will they do about your cat?

The judge noted that the Board had a “duty to act fairly in making a decision that affects the rights, privileges or interests of an owner.” 

Condominium Decisions are not made in a vacuum but Condominium purchasers also need to know that rules exist to be enforced; not bend by exemption.

If the building is no pets;  OTHER owners purchased there under that understanding.


In a recent Alberta case, Condominium Plan No. 762 1302 v. Stebbing, the condominium corporation was unsuccessful in its attempt to have a cat removed from the property.  The condominium by-laws provided that no animal or pet was permitted without the approval of the board, which approval could be arbitrarily withheld and if given, could be withdrawn upon 15 days’ notice. The by-laws also provided that the Board could request removal of any animal that is deemed a nuisance or annoyance.
Ms. Stebbing, the owner, had made Board approval of her cats a condition of the purchase of her unit.  She was under the mistaken impression that approval had been granted at the time that she purchased her unit.  Everything was fine for a couple of years.
After more than two years the Board demanded that Ms. Stebbing‘s cats be removed on the basis that no consent had been obtained. The Board had received complaints from some owners who were allergic to cats, although no specific complaint was directed at Mrs.  Stebbing’s cats. There were a number of pets in the condominium, some of which had approval and others that did not.  When Ms. Stebbing refused to remove her cats the condominium commenced a court application.
The judge noted that the Board had a “duty to act fairly in making a decision that affects the rights, privileges or interests of an owner.”  In view of the fact that the Board had allowed this situation to exist for some time and subsequently changed its position the Court considered whether the Board’s behavior was oppressive or unfairly prejudicial. “Pets are not simply chattels.  Compliance with Section 67 of the [Alberta Condominium Property] Act in this case requires balancing the inconvenience and discomfort suffered by other residents with depriving another of the comfort and companionship a pet affords its owner.  It is not simply a case of the Board always siding with an owner with allergies.” The judge further noted that the 15-day removal provision in the by-law should be reserved for extreme cases.
At the end of the day the court did not make any finding on whether the Board’s conduct was oppressive or unfairly prejudicial.  Instead the judge made a declaration that Ms. Stebbing’s cat (one had previously passed away) was in breach of the condominium by-law as written consent had never been obtained, but he stayed enforcement until the cat died or was relocated by the owner.
This case illustrates that if a Board delays in enforcing the condominium documents, it risks finding that a provision may not be enforceable against a particular owner.  If the board becomes aware of any breach of the condominium documents, it must act promptly and consistently in taking any enforcement steps.
However the Board should be consulting with legal counsel if there are any possible human rights considerations at play, as the Board’s duty to enforce the condominium  documents must be balanced with its duty to accommodate persons with disabilities.  Matters  of this nature will  need to be reviewed with legal counsel on a case-by-case basis.  Readers can refer to many of our previous blogs that deal more specifically with human rights issues.
- See more at: http://www.condoreporter.com/?p=3325#sthash.5UKp3jGu.dpuf